Core Principle: Strong individual liberties and property rights with government limited to protecting sentient rights, public safety, and order. Opt-in mechanisms where possible; harsh accountability for criminals and officials; skepticism of overreach but support for effective enforcement.
Individual Liberty vs State Power
-
Government mandates justified only for clear public safety (e.g., vaccine mandates during deadly pandemics to protect the healthy).
-
No speech codes except direct threats/calls to violence.
-
Surveillance acceptable in public (no privacy expectation).
-
Personal choices end when they infringe on others’ sentient or property rights.
Privacy Rights
-
Strong 4th Amendment protections.
-
Data collection only with explicit opt-in and clear disclosure.
-
Digital privacy options for those who decline sharing.
-
Public surveillance allowed; private data use requires notification and consent.
Due Process & Rule of Law
-
All accountable for actions; higher officials held to stricter standards.
-
Asset forfeiture allowed for broken contracts/debts between private parties.
-
Skeptical of bail system.
-
Expand death penalty; life imprisonment wasteful - prioritize execution for serious crimes.
-
Expand prisons; stricter judicial vetting and sentencing to prevent repeat offenders.
Police & Law Enforcement
-
Heavily fund and expand police; well-paid and respected.
-
Officers held to higher liability for misconduct.
-
Nationwide body cams mandatory.
-
Militarized policing in high-crime areas with zero tolerance.
-
Harsh penalties for theft, burglary, and erosion of high-trust society.
Voting & Elections
-
Mandatory voter ID.
-
Reformed mail-in voting with strict authentication and encryption.
-
No felon voting.
-
Voter eligibility requires passing unbiased civics/knowledge test (bipartisan).
-
Campaign finance reform: Limit to individual donations; oppose Citizens United corporate influence.
Freedom of Association
-
Private businesses/clubs free to discriminate/associate as they wish (absent direct sentient rights violations).
-
Anti-discrimination laws narrowly tailored to genuine safety/well-being protections.
Property Rights
-
Strong protections: Once purchased, land is owned perpetually.
-
Eminent domain heavily limited.
-
Zoning not treated as taking.
-
Intellectual property protected (though conceptually weak).
-
Lethal force justified to defend property from theft/encroachment.
Surveillance State
-
Facial recognition and advanced surveillance opt-in only (public areas have no privacy expectation).
-
Social credit systems opt-in only.
-
Tech-government partnerships acceptable if sentient rights and consumer protections upheld.
-
Public data use requires notification and consent beyond basic viewing.
Individual Liberty vs State Power:
Where do you draw the line on government authority over personal choices (e.g., vaccine mandates, lockdowns, speech codes, surveillance)?
Governments should mandate when it is in the best interest and safety of the people, as is their purpose. This should generally be limited. To prevent the spread of a deadly virus, it makes sense to attempt to mandate vaccines - the rights of those who are sick or unvaccinated should not trump the rights of the healthy to remain healthy. This should not be a political issue. There should be no speech codes in public areas, besides threats and calls to violence. Surveillance in public areas is perfectly acceptable as there is no expectation of privacy in public. All personal choices end the moment they affect another. It is the responsibility of the government to protect sentient rights, and the property rights of sentient beings.
Privacy Rights:
Strong 4th Amendment protections? Limits on NSA/FBI surveillance, data collection, digital privacy?
Strong 4th amendment protection. All data collection should only be collected from opt-in partners that explicitly state where your data will be going and how it will be shared. Digital privacy should be an option for all if they decline data sharing. If private companies want to use your data and be invasive, for services or otherwise, everything should be explicitly and clearly explained before use - I.E. location data with Google Maps.
Due Process & Rule of Law:
Reform qualified immunity? Asset forfeiture? Bail reform? Death penalty stance?
All people should be held liable for their actions. Higher elected officials and those with great responsibility should be offered more in salary but held to higher standards. Assets can be forfeited if contracts are broken or debts unpaid between private actors. I am skeptical about the concept of bail. The death penalty should be expanded and many more people should be put to death for the crimes they commit. Life in prison is a drain on society’s resources - these people should simply be expunged. Prison’s should be greatly expanded and judges should be much more stringently vetted to appropriately apply punishment. There are far too many instances of repeat offenders causing great damage - this should never happen.
Police & Law Enforcement:
Defund, reform, or strengthen? Body cams, qualified immunity, militarization?
The police should be heavily funded and expanded. The responsibilities and dangers of a police officer should be very well-paid and well-respected. If police officers break laws, they should be held to higher levels of criminal liability and punishment than regular citizens - likewise for elected officials. Body cams should be mandated nationwide. Militarized police enforcement in ultra-high crime areas, and increased enforcement in high crime areas with proper protections and punishments to destroy crime. Zero tolerance. Theft and burglary should also be treated severely. Any erosion of a high trust society with criminals and bad actors should be harshly addressed. Criminals infringe upon the sentient rights of others, their victims deserve utmost protection under the law.
Voting & Elections:
Voter ID, mail-in voting, same-day registration, felon voting, campaign finance?
Voted ID should be federally mandated. Mail-in voting should be carefully reformed for complete and total authentication of the voter and transmitted via encrypted channel with world-class cybersecurity measures. Felons should not be able to vote. Voter eligibility should not be a universal right - there should be an amendment for voters to pass a bipartisan, unbiased, thorough political and social knowledge examination. If they fail to meet a standard of knowledge of our government and the laws they are voting for, they should not be allowed to vote. Campaign finance should be reformed - money in politics is dangerous and disadvantageous to small candidates. I do not agree with Citizens United in that corporations have the voice of people - I think finances should be limited to individual donations, not organized donation campaigns.
Freedom of Association:
Right to discriminate in private business/clubs? Anti-discrimination laws scope?
Private businesses can refuse service to whoever they wish, for any reason, as long as sentient rights are not being infringed. Anti-discrimination laws should be very carefully written, but yes, laws should exist to protect the safety and well-being of all individuals, just as regulation should elsewhere. The role of the government is to protect people.
Property Rights:
Eminent domain limits? Zoning as taking? Intellectual property strength?
All land is owned buy the county that it is in, until an individual purchases that land from the government. Once they have purchased the section, they own it, and their property is theirs forever. Intellectual property has always been a weak concept, but I agree it should be protected. Property rights should be protected by the government against infringement. Lethal force is justified to protect property that rightfully belongs to you from being stolen or encroached upon.
Surveillance State:
Facial recognition, social credit elements, tech company-government partnerships?
Facial recognition should always be opt-in, never mandated, however if you are in public, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. Social credit should be opt-in, never mandated. Tech companies and government partnerships are fine as long as sentient rights are respected, and consumer protections are upheld. Surveillance is fine in public areas - for further data mining from this surveillance data, if a company wishes to use public data, the person should be notified and their data must be opted into sharing before it is used in any way beyond viewing.